Improve schema ergonomics a bit, especially around slicing

The previous approach was moving towards having each attribute on a
locus do multiple different things, depending on context, and I think
that was headed towards being a mess.

This idea is to have actual locus objects be dumb containers, and have
various wrappers that call methods on the attributes to do interesting
work.
This commit is contained in:
Eevee (Lexy Munroe) 2016-11-21 19:28:55 -08:00
parent aa92ccb7ad
commit 7f7cca6c58

View file

@ -105,12 +105,17 @@ class LocusMeta(type):
sup.__init_subclass__(**kwargs) sup.__init_subclass__(**kwargs)
return self return self
def __init__(cls, *args, **kwargs):
super().__init__(*args)
class Locus(metaclass=LocusMeta): class Locus(metaclass=LocusMeta):
_attributes = {} _attributes = {}
def __init_subclass__(cls, **kwargs): def __init_subclass__(cls, *, sliced_by=(), **kwargs):
# super().__init_subclass__(**kwargs) # super().__init_subclass__(**kwargs)
# TODO how... do i... make an attribute on the class that's not inherited by instances
cls.sliced_by = sliced_by
cls._attributes = cls._attributes.copy() cls._attributes = cls._attributes.copy()
for key, value in cls.__dict__.items(): for key, value in cls.__dict__.items():
if isinstance(value, _Attribute): if isinstance(value, _Attribute):
@ -132,7 +137,7 @@ class Locus(metaclass=LocusMeta):
) )
class VersionedLocus(Locus): class VersionedLocus(Locus, sliced_by=['game']):
def __init_subclass__(cls, **kwargs): def __init_subclass__(cls, **kwargs):
super(VersionedLocus, cls).__init_subclass__(**kwargs) super(VersionedLocus, cls).__init_subclass__(**kwargs)
@ -145,6 +150,10 @@ class VersionedLocus(Locus):
cls._slices = {} cls._slices = {}
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Loci definitions
# TODO seems to me that each of these, regardless of whether they have any # TODO seems to me that each of these, regardless of whether they have any
# additional data attached or not, are restricted to a fixed extra-game-ular # additional data attached or not, are restricted to a fixed extra-game-ular
# list of identifiers # list of identifiers
@ -158,9 +167,6 @@ Pokedex = _ForwardDeclaration()
class Pokémon(VersionedLocus): class Pokémon(VersionedLocus):
# TODO version, language. but those are kind of meta-fields; do they need
# treating specially?
name = _Localized(str) name = _Localized(str)
types = _List(Type, min=1, max=2) types = _List(Type, min=1, max=2)
@ -199,6 +205,41 @@ class Pokémon(VersionedLocus):
Pokemon = Pokémon Pokemon = Pokémon
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# The repository class, primary interface to the data
class LocusReader:
def __init__(self, identifier, locus, **kwargs):
self.identifier = identifier
self.locus = locus
# TODO what is kwargs here? in this case we really want a slice, right...?
def __getattr__(self):
pass
def __dir__(self):
pass
class QuantumProperty:
def __init__(self, qlocus, attr):
self.qlocus = qlocus
self.attr = attr
def __repr__(self):
return repr({key: getattr(locus, self.attr) for (key, locus) in self.qlocus.locus_map.items()})
class QuantumLocusReader:
def __init__(self, identifier, locus_cls, locus_map):
self.identifier = identifier
self.locus_cls = locus_cls
self.locus_map = locus_map
def __getattr__(self, attr):
return QuantumProperty(self, attr)
def __repr__(self):
return "<{}*: {}>".format(self.locus_cls.__name__, self.identifier)
class Repository: class Repository:
def __init__(self): def __init__(self):
# type -> identifier -> object # type -> identifier -> object
@ -206,28 +247,27 @@ class Repository:
# type -> property -> value -> list of objects # type -> property -> value -> list of objects
self.index = defaultdict(lambda: defaultdict(lambda: defaultdict(set))) self.index = defaultdict(lambda: defaultdict(lambda: defaultdict(set)))
def add(self, obj): def add(self, identifier, locus, **kwargs):
# TODO kwargs are used for slicing, e.g. a pokemon has a game, but this needs some rigid definition
# TODO this should be declared by the type itself, obviously # TODO this should be declared by the type itself, obviously
cls = type(obj) cls = type(locus)
# TODO both branches here should check for duplicates _basket = self.objects[cls].setdefault(identifier, {})
if isinstance(obj, Slice): # TODO so in the case of slicing (which is most loci), we don't
cls = cls.base_class # actually want to store a single object, but a sliced-up collection of
if obj.identifier not in self.objects[cls]: # them (indicated by kwargs). but then it's kind of up in the air what
glom = cls() # we'll actually get /back/ when we go to fetch that object, and that
glom.identifier = obj.identifier # is unsatisfying to me. i could make this a list of "baskets", which
self.objects[cls][obj.identifier] = glom # may hold one object or a number of slices, but i'm not sure how i
else: # feel about that; might have to just see how other loci work out.
glom = self.objects[cls][obj.identifier] # TODO either way, this is very hardcoded and needs to not be
# TODO this... feels special-cased, but i guess, it is? _basket[kwargs['game']] = locus
glom._slices[obj.game] = obj
else:
self.objects[cls][obj.identifier] = obj
# TODO this is more complex now that names are multi-language # TODO this is more complex now that names are multi-language
#self.index[cls][cls.name][obj.name].add(obj) #self.index[cls][cls.name][locus.name].add(locus)
def fetch(self, cls, identifier): def fetch(self, cls, identifier):
# TODO wrap in a... multi-thing # TODO wrap in a... multi-thing
return self.objects[cls][identifier] #return self.objects[cls][identifier]
return QuantumLocusReader(identifier, cls, self.objects[cls][identifier])
# TODO clean this garbage up -- better way of iterating the type, actually work for something other than pokemon... # TODO clean this garbage up -- better way of iterating the type, actually work for something other than pokemon...
@ -247,7 +287,7 @@ def _dump_locus(locus):
@POKEDEX_TYPES.loader('pokemon', version=None) @POKEDEX_TYPES.loader('pokemon', version=None)
def _load_locus(data, version): def _load_locus(data, version):
cls = Pokemon.Sliced cls = Pokémon
# TODO wrap with a writer thing? # TODO wrap with a writer thing?
obj = cls() obj = cls()
for key, value in data.items(): for key, value in data.items():
@ -258,33 +298,23 @@ def _load_locus(data, version):
return obj return obj
def _temp_main(): def load_repository():
repository = Repository() repository = Repository()
# just testing for now # just testing for now
cam = camel.Camel([POKEDEX_TYPES]) cam = camel.Camel([POKEDEX_TYPES])
PATH = 'pokedex/data/ww-red/pokemon.yaml' for game in ('jp-red', 'jp-green', 'jp-blue', 'ww-red', 'ww-blue', 'yellow'):
with open(PATH) as f: path = "pokedex/data/{}/pokemon.yaml".format(game)
all_pokemon = cam.load(f.read()) with open(path) as f:
for identifier, pokemon in all_pokemon.items(): all_pokemon = cam.load(f.read())
# TODO i don't reeeally like this, but configuring a camel to do it for identifier, pokemon in all_pokemon.items():
# is a little unwieldy repository.add(identifier, pokemon, game=game)
pokemon.game = 'ww-red'
# TODO this in particular seems extremely clumsy, but identifiers ARE fundamentally keys...
pokemon.identifier = identifier
repository.add(pokemon) return repository, all_pokemon
PATH = 'pokedex/data/ww-blue/pokemon.yaml'
with open(PATH) as f:
all_pokemon = cam.load(f.read())
for identifier, pokemon in all_pokemon.items():
# TODO i don't reeeally like this, but configuring a camel to do it
# is a little unwieldy
pokemon.game = 'ww-blue'
# TODO this in particular seems extremely clumsy, but identifiers ARE fundamentally keys...
pokemon.identifier = identifier
repository.add(pokemon)
def _temp_main():
repository, all_pokemon = load_repository()
# TODO NEXT TODO # TODO NEXT TODO
# - how does the composite object work, exactly? eevee.name.single? eevee.name.latest? no, name needs a language... # - how does the composite object work, exactly? eevee.name.single? eevee.name.latest? no, name needs a language...